When is AJAX an overkill for your ASP.NET-jQuery web applications? Part-1

AJAX libraries have simplified developer’s life by providing clean & easy-to-use API. Their usage is so simple that we developers over use it, without realizing the performance impacts. In this article, I would like to explain few scenarios in which AJAX can be an overkill for your web apps.

The motto is to help fellow developers take better design decisions at an early stage, rather than repenting and fine tuning later. Below are real time problems, faced in a large scale ASP.NET/jQuery AJAX based web app, which should be given a serious thought:

(1) AJAX based navigation: 

“Keep DOM manipulations to the minimum” is what every JavaScript library says, but over use of AJAX based navigation defeats this purpose and you may rethink the design, unless your client specifically wants it.

If you are wondering what AJAX based navigation means, check jqGrid demos site. There are no post backs at all even while navigation. Content pages are fetched via AJAX and injected into a parent page, with a huge DOM manipulation.

If the page is small with very less number of DOM elements, AJAX navigation is fine. As the number of elements increase in the page, injecting the page takes longer time and beyond a point, causes ‘stop running script’ error, as discussed in my previous article. Typically, business applications contain hundreds of controls in a page, causing severe performance bottlenecks.

If you see Facebook, the Home, Profile, Account etc links on the top do a full post back and fetch the page, while any other operation is an AJAX call, which is a cooler approach.

Bottom line: AJAX navigation has performance problems when pages are huge. But it can solve problems like maintaining state by storing data in DOM elements, reducing session variables and reducing load on the server. So weigh these choices before taking a call.

You may find the total number of elements in the page using the jQuery code, $(‘*’).length; So be cautious of this count while injecting a page. In a complex page like Yahoo.com, there are about 780 elements (each html tag corresponds to one element). Make sure your page is having not more than 1000 DOM elements. If the count is running into thousands, then split your pages.

(2) Client side templating:

If you liked asp.net repeater and are looking for client side templating, hold on! There is a difference between asp.net repeater and client side templates.

In the case of a repeater, processing takes place on the server and not much load is on the browser. However, in the case of templates, processing as well as injection is on the client. Imagine templating 100 rows, with each row containing 30 elements. You end up having 3000 elements which is alarming!

I can give you the example of twitter.com or facebook.com. Both have a ‘more’ sort of button at the bottom, which fetch more records. What happens if you want to see the posts of last ten days? You end up with thousands of DOM elements and your browser slows down.

Bottom line: In terms of performance, what is apparent to the developer is only the time taken to process the template. But what is hidden is, the time taken for clearing events, handling memory leaks, cleaning missing tags and injecting the template. All this happens in jQuery’s .html() method.

So, if you want to template huge data, make sure you are implementing pagination. Again, as in the above case, $(‘*’).length is the key.

(3) Tabs:

Thanks to this fancy UI technique, which gives a wizard sort of appearance to the content. If you are looking only at the fundo part of it, you are getting into problems! The scenario gets worst when you have AJAX tabs which fetch huge pages.

Let’s say each page has ~700 elements. So if you have 5 tabs, you are having ~3500 elements. Imagine having blur, click, live events for so many elements. It’s a complete mess! Also, you will be running into context related issues, since 2 tabs can have 2 different controls with the same ID. When you are on an active tab, the content of the rest of the tabs is only hidden, but not removed. So your app’s performance is bad yet again.

Bottom line: If you want to use tabs with optimal performance, make sure you are clearing the mark up of the tabs which are not active. At any point of time, make sure your $(‘*’).length is always less than 1000, for better results.

I think I have covered quite a lot. I’m still facing several bottlenecks in my beautiful project and trying to figure out the solutions with my architect. Will cover more scenarios in my next article.

Happy coding :)

Update: This second part of this article is continued in my next blog post.

The curious case of "Stop running script" error & jQuery

Before starting with the article, I would like to share something which encouraged me a lot. Now I'm a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional (MVP) for ASP.NET. Thanks to Microsoft folks for recognizing my efforts. :)


Coming to the point., have you ever faced the below “Stop running script” error message in your thick client web apps? This is one of the most frustrating errors, which hangs the browser, spikes CPU usage and slows down your operations.



Nicholas C. Zakas has an excellent article on why it occurs in various browsers. In short, his research says that the error occurs in various browsers due to exceedingly high number of operations taking place(~5 million statements in IE), or due to script executing for a very long time(~10 secs in FF).

For best performance, Nich says that no script should take longer than 100 ms to execute on any browser, at any point of time.


Now, why should jQuery developers worry about this?

They should, because jQuery is made of nothing but JavaScript and chances of getting this error are more, if you don't understand the core methods properly. Let's see in detail what this means.


Take the below script as example. Execute in Firebug console or in IE8 script panel or simply copy/paste in a html file and open it.

(function exec(){ 
    var str=''; 
        str+='<div>test div '+i+'</div>'; 
    $('body').append('<div id="TestDiv"></div>');

Note: The above code might crash your browser. So please try in stand alone instance. If you are not getting the error or experiencing different behaviour, probably you have better CPU which does not spike up to 100% for this code. The point here is about wrong usage of code. So increasing the max condition should give the error. This analysis is as per jQuery version: 1.3.2.


What I'm doing here is pretty straight forward. Just looping and creating 10000 elements and injecting them into the DOM. Now, what's so important here?

It's just a simple piece of code. 10000 operations in a loop is way beyond the threshold of 5 million operations. When you run this code for the first time, browser stops responding and when you run this for the second time, you get the 'stop running script' error.


This might sound silly at a first glance. Such huge loops will obviously cause such errors. But what if you are doing this in your code without your knowledge? Do you know that this error occurs in several facebook apps & in twitter? There is something beyond the loop.


$().html vs element.innerHTML:

Replace the line:


with this one:


and now try. We are using native JavaScript's innerHTML to inject DOM elements. This is faster than jQuery's .html() and hence no error.


Does this mean this is the mistake of jQuery?? No! It's purely developer’s ignorance. First of all, such huge DOM manipulations should not be made (This is commonly used, unknowingly.). Then, you should be aware of what .html() does.


$(‘selector’).html() internally removes event handlers attached to every child element in the selector’s DOM tree , cleans up the incoming mark up by adding unclosed tags and then injects the new mark up. So for the first time, since no DOM elements were there, .html() only cleans the new mark up and injects it. For the second time, it has the additional task of removing the event handlers and hence the number of operations are increased, giving the error.


So when should I use .innerHTML and when should I use .html()?

Genuine doubt! Use .innerHTML if you are SURE that you have to JUST replace the mark up, provided your mark up does not contain any events attached to it. Use jQuery’s .html() when you want to unbind events attached to elements and take care of garbage collection/memory leaks. (You may refer to “jQuery cookbook” for more info on this).


This is not the only pitfall. JavaScript’s native for(;;) loop is faster than jQuery's $.each() loop. So before enjoying the benefits of the library, analyze the bottle necks too.


(Q) When does such scenarios arise? Why would someone loop some 10000 times in their code?

(A) Though practically no developer loops ten thousand times in his code, knowing that it’s a performance issue, people tend to make this mistake unknowingly. The analogy here is about larger DOM manipulations. I shall explain such scenarios in my next article.


Happy coding :)